WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.060 --> 00:00:03.149
It is time to end the series on Laserdisc.

00:00:03.149 --> 00:00:07.460
I know, I know, it’s tragic, but I’ve
been putting it off and and its long overdue.

00:00:07.460 --> 00:00:11.210
Many new subscribers have perhaps not seen
any of my Laserdisc series, and I’ll place

00:00:11.210 --> 00:00:13.330
a link to the playlist down below.

00:00:13.330 --> 00:00:14.960
As the fastest recap possible,

00:00:14.960 --> 00:00:20.580
Laserdiscs were the first optical disc format,
predating the CD by four years, and they held

00:00:20.589 --> 00:00:26.330
up to an hour of excellent quality video--nearly
that of DVD--with CD quality digital sound.

00:00:26.330 --> 00:00:31.460
They never achieved great success in the US
or really all of Europe due to the high cost of the system

00:00:31.460 --> 00:00:36.260
and the inability to record television shows on
them, but in Japan they were pretty successful

00:00:36.270 --> 00:00:38.320
reaching about a 10% market penetration.

00:00:38.320 --> 00:00:42.190
I’d also like to just throw in here because
I keep forgetting to do so, I’m on Twitter

00:00:42.190 --> 00:00:44.040
now @TechConnectify.

00:00:44.040 --> 00:00:47.670
That’s only the second time I’ve mentioned
that and I’ve had it for two months now.

00:00:47.670 --> 00:00:49.060
I’m really good at this!

00:00:49.060 --> 00:00:54.190
Now, this final video on the format goes over
three things: One, the discs popularity in

00:00:54.190 --> 00:01:00.150
karaoke, two the Japan-only Squeeze LD format
and Three, the MUSE high definition Laserdisc.

00:01:00.150 --> 00:01:03.100
We’ll start with that because that’s what’s
the title and thumbnail said.

00:01:03.100 --> 00:01:07.760
Japan, being Japan, was way ahead of the rest
of the world when it came to high definition

00:01:07.760 --> 00:01:08.760
television.

00:01:08.760 --> 00:01:13.119
As an American, I think of HD as being a product
of the early 2000’s, especially with the

00:01:13.119 --> 00:01:18.229
introduction of Blu-Ray and HD-DVD in 2006
providing the first form of high definition

00:01:18.229 --> 00:01:19.679
home video.

00:01:19.679 --> 00:01:24.899
That is of course only if you don’t count
the first D-Theater D-VHS releases from 2002.

00:01:24.899 --> 00:01:29.270
And I am aware that the first HD broadcast
in the US took place in 1996, but adoption

00:01:29.270 --> 00:01:32.360
didn’t really take off until 2004-2005.

00:01:32.360 --> 00:01:38.469
But in Japan, a new analog High Definition
standard began test broadcasts in 1989 via

00:01:38.469 --> 00:01:42.080
satellite, and it was in development as far
back as 1979.

00:01:42.080 --> 00:01:48.100
This standard was called MUSE, which was a sloppy acronym for Multiple sub-Nyquist Sampling Encoding.

00:01:48.100 --> 00:01:53.340
NHK, the national broadcasting company in
Japan, preferred the name Hi-Vision.

00:01:53.340 --> 00:01:58.350
The actual specifics of MUSE are very very
complicated and involve some strange sampling

00:01:58.350 --> 00:02:02.579
techniques to increase the resolution that
go way over my head.

00:02:02.579 --> 00:02:05.950
Apparently it’s not strictly analog but
also includes some digital sampling that is

00:02:05.950 --> 00:02:10.869
limited by movement within the frame and it’s
just real weird so please visit some of the

00:02:10.869 --> 00:02:13.230
links down below if you’d like to learn
more.

00:02:13.230 --> 00:02:19.120
But in simple terms, MUSE produced a video
source nearly equivalent to today’s 1080i resolution.

00:02:19.120 --> 00:02:26.569
With 1,125 lines transmitted, of which 1035
were visible, you could call the resolution 1035i.

00:02:26.569 --> 00:02:29.569
And similar to NTSC, it used a 60 hz refresh
rate.

00:02:29.569 --> 00:02:33.659
To get the MUSE signal on a Laserdisc required
tweaking the format somewhat.

00:02:33.659 --> 00:02:36.819
The most significant twist was the adoption
of a red laser.

00:02:36.819 --> 00:02:40.890
If you thought DVD was the first format to
use the red laser, think again.

00:02:40.890 --> 00:02:45.400
Just as the pits in a DVD are smaller and
allow for more data on the disc compared to

00:02:45.400 --> 00:02:50.939
a CD, the smaller pits of MUSE laserdiscs
allowed for a higher bandwidth analog signal

00:02:50.939 --> 00:02:52.410
than a conventional Laserdisc.

00:02:52.410 --> 00:02:57.379
Hi-Vision Laserdiscs used the same CAV and
CLV flavors of your standard discs, but due

00:02:57.379 --> 00:03:01.661
to a higher linear speed required--apparently
the pits were still the same length, just

00:03:01.661 --> 00:03:06.239
squished closer together-- CAV discs used
a smaller portion of the disc, with the inner

00:03:06.239 --> 00:03:09.330
radius being pushed out 76 millimeters.

00:03:09.330 --> 00:03:15.599
And CLV discs used the entire face of the
disc, but the inner portion was read at 2,700 RPM.

00:03:15.599 --> 00:03:16.599
My word.

00:03:16.599 --> 00:03:17.599
That is ridiculous.

00:03:17.599 --> 00:03:24.469
OK, just as a reminder, these discs weigh
a tad over 200g, or just under half a pound.

00:03:24.469 --> 00:03:30.500
And a consumer piece of A/V equipment would
get this massive disc spinning at 2,700 RPM.

00:03:30.500 --> 00:03:36.290
If the disc were rolling, it would be travelling
at 152.6 kilometers per hour, or about 95

00:03:36.290 --> 00:03:37.470
miles per hour.

00:03:37.470 --> 00:03:38.800
In your living room.

00:03:38.800 --> 00:03:43.829
For more context into this absurdity, a standard
Laserdisc spins at up to 1,800 RPM and already

00:03:43.829 --> 00:03:46.000
that seems too fast for comfort.

00:03:46.000 --> 00:03:48.580
Just listen to this player spin a disc up.

00:03:50.340 --> 00:04:05.140
[loud, building whirring noise, with a bassy vibration]

00:04:05.140 --> 00:04:07.260
To be fair, this old beast is louder than

00:04:07.300 --> 00:04:11.520
newer players, but newer players are still
plenty frightening when their covers are off.

00:04:12.200 --> 00:04:14.340
[mechanical sounds as transport engages with disc]

00:04:14.340 --> 00:04:28.780
[Slightly less loud whirring noise, but still
at unsettling speeds]

00:04:28.780 --> 00:04:30.940
Now imagine that 50% faster.

00:04:30.940 --> 00:04:31.940
Yikes.

00:04:31.940 --> 00:04:36.270
Anyway, even though Japan was early for HD,
and MUSE Laserdisc was among the earliest

00:04:36.270 --> 00:04:40.540
ways to get HD content, it was the Laserdisc
of Laserdiscs.

00:04:40.540 --> 00:04:43.860
Adoption was very poor, and the players were
mighty expensive.

00:04:43.870 --> 00:04:48.900
Plus, they required a separate MUSE decoder
to actually create a component output to send

00:04:48.900 --> 00:04:50.130
to your TV.

00:04:50.130 --> 00:04:53.910
But still, near 1080i video on a disc in the
mid nineties?

00:04:53.910 --> 00:04:55.419
That’s pretty wild.

00:04:55.419 --> 00:05:00.020
Today, these MUSE Laserdisc players are highly
sought after for numerous reasons.

00:05:00.020 --> 00:05:02.949
First is probably their collectability and
relative rarity.

00:05:02.949 --> 00:05:05.220
And trust me, they aren’t common.

00:05:05.220 --> 00:05:09.449
As I write this, on eBay there’s a player
with an asking price of $1800, and someone

00:05:09.449 --> 00:05:12.400
else wants nearly $4000 for theirs.

00:05:12.400 --> 00:05:16.160
Discs are also hideously expensive, commanding
$300 or more.

00:05:16.160 --> 00:05:20.400
But aside from their novelty, they are among
the best laserdisc players available.

00:05:20.400 --> 00:05:25.780
These players used their red laser to read standard
NTSC laserdiscs too, and the shorter wavelength

00:05:25.780 --> 00:05:29.020
of the laser means it could read discs more
easily.

00:05:29.020 --> 00:05:31.970
Scratched and worn discs play better on a
MUSE machine.

00:05:31.970 --> 00:05:37.380
Really, all discs play better on MUSE machines
because the red laser almost entirely eliminates

00:05:37.380 --> 00:05:41.280
crosstalk, and its more advanced electronics
produce a better output.

00:05:41.280 --> 00:05:45.570
Moving on then, for those that aren’t already
aware, karaoke is a BIG deal in many parts

00:05:45.570 --> 00:05:46.720
of Asia.

00:05:46.720 --> 00:05:50.530
Much of Laserdisc’s success came from Asia
at large, and some of this was due to its

00:05:50.530 --> 00:05:53.250
seemingly perfect alignment with the karaoke
business.

00:05:53.250 --> 00:05:55.870
Karaoke, after all, began in Japan.

00:05:55.870 --> 00:06:00.389
Pioneer was involved in the karaoke business
to a surprising degree, apparently producing

00:06:00.389 --> 00:06:02.990
many of the music videos used in karaoke machines.

00:06:02.990 --> 00:06:07.130
Which, of course, were made very flexible
with the use of Laserdiscs.

00:06:07.130 --> 00:06:12.599
Pioneer made various models of Laserdisc jukeboxes
that could hold 50 or more discs.

00:06:12.599 --> 00:06:17.350
These machines, with catalogs of up to 100
hours of material available all in one place,

00:06:17.350 --> 00:06:20.879
helped make Laserdisc the format of choice
for karaoke machines.

00:06:20.879 --> 00:06:25.060
To be clear, though, there were and are many
different types of karaoke venue; those that

00:06:25.060 --> 00:06:28.900
would have one of the Laserdisc jukeboxes
were probably in a small percentage of the

00:06:28.900 --> 00:06:29.900
total.

00:06:29.900 --> 00:06:32.699
Still, laserdisc as a format was used fairly
widely.

00:06:32.699 --> 00:06:37.470
Now, if you weren’t aware, a large innovation
in Karaoke was the development of the CD+G

00:06:37.470 --> 00:06:40.660
format, that’s compact disc-graphics.

00:06:40.660 --> 00:06:45.490
Using the rarely-used subcode channels of
an audio CD, the CD+G was able to store basic

00:06:45.490 --> 00:06:51.500
graphics (16 colors at a resolution of 300
X 216) alongside the audio.

00:06:51.500 --> 00:06:55.760
Karaoke machines displayed these graphics,
which were usually lyrics, while playing a disc.

00:06:55.760 --> 00:06:57.940
Laserdisc received a similar extension.

00:06:57.949 --> 00:07:01.419
The LD-G addition wasn’t quite as impressive,
though.

00:07:01.419 --> 00:07:05.660
Info on its specifics is sparse, but it appears
it was more along the lines of a closed-captioning

00:07:05.660 --> 00:07:10.449
system, with white text on black boxes resembling
the standard line 21 decoding we have here

00:07:10.449 --> 00:07:11.539
in the States.

00:07:11.540 --> 00:07:14.340
The actual data was hidden in the audio stream.

00:07:14.340 --> 00:07:17.000
While it wasn’t as impressive as CD-Graphics...

00:07:17.000 --> 00:07:18.930
it’s a Laserdisc so it has full motion

00:07:18.930 --> 00:07:20.270
video going on already.

00:07:20.270 --> 00:07:25.620
Plus, the LD-G standard supported 16 different
data streams, so multiple languages of lyrics

00:07:25.620 --> 00:07:27.830
or subtitles could be supported.

00:07:27.830 --> 00:07:32.409
Whether or not LD-G made its way into karaoke
is unclear, but it’s still pretty neat.

00:07:32.409 --> 00:07:35.150
Well, it seems as though this final installment
will be pretty short.

00:07:35.150 --> 00:07:38.180
I suppose it is pretty much a “here’s
three other things we haven’t talked about

00:07:38.180 --> 00:07:39.770
Laserdisc yet!” episode.

00:07:39.770 --> 00:07:40.770
Hmm.

00:07:40.770 --> 00:07:44.980
Well anyway, the third and final thing is
what we are going to refer to as “Squeeze LD”

00:07:44.980 --> 00:07:46.580
because that’s what it’s called.

00:07:46.580 --> 00:07:49.760
Just as DVD can store the video on discs anamorphically,

00:07:49.760 --> 00:07:51.930
whereby the image is squeezed in from side

00:07:51.930 --> 00:07:54.720
to side, Laserdisc could do it too!

00:07:54.720 --> 00:07:56.140
But only in Japan.

00:07:56.140 --> 00:07:57.680
And only sometimes.

00:07:57.680 --> 00:08:01.830
So as a refresher, the reason why this is
a good idea is that for widescreen displays,

00:08:01.830 --> 00:08:06.060
it really helps if the content going to them
is also widescreen.

00:08:06.060 --> 00:08:12.300
We could create a new 16:9 video standard,
but sending a 16:9 signal to a 4:3 display

00:08:12.300 --> 00:08:13.700
might get messy.

00:08:13.710 --> 00:08:17.129
What we want is something that would be compatible
with both.

00:08:17.129 --> 00:08:21.099
Anamorphic widescreen is a way to use the
existing 4:3 video standard for widescreen

00:08:21.099 --> 00:08:22.800
in a non-destructive way.

00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:27.150
In a DVD, if the disc is made using anamorphic
widescreen, the actual video looks like this.

00:08:27.860 --> 00:08:32.460
If this signal is going to a widescreen display,
A DVD player will send this as is, and the

00:08:32.460 --> 00:08:35.709
TV will stretch that image out to fill itself
in.

00:08:35.709 --> 00:08:40.360
If you don’t have a widescreen TV, then
the DVD player will squish the image downward

00:08:40.360 --> 00:08:44.680
and add letterboxes to the top and bottom
to restore the correct aspect ratio.

00:08:44.680 --> 00:08:48.720
Of course you can encode the video with the
letterboxing, but then you’re wasting much

00:08:48.720 --> 00:08:51.250
of the resolution on black bars.

00:08:51.250 --> 00:08:54.430
This means to fill a widescreen display, you
have to zoom it in.

00:08:54.430 --> 00:08:58.600
And if you make these chunks go offscreen,
you’re making all of that resolution just

00:08:58.600 --> 00:09:00.040
go away.

00:09:00.040 --> 00:09:04.710
By using anamorphic widescreen, none of the
image is lost, it just becomes stretched.

00:09:04.710 --> 00:09:08.769
To use digital terms, it takes pixels that
should be square and stretches them sideways

00:09:08.769 --> 00:09:09.769
into rectangles.

00:09:09.769 --> 00:09:13.100
But of course Laserdisc isn’t digital so
there aren’t pixels.

00:09:13.100 --> 00:09:15.000
Let’s not go down that path…

00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:19.560
Squeeze LD was perhaps the first time anamorphic
widescreen was found in home video.

00:09:19.560 --> 00:09:24.240
But it was rare for players to be able to
unsqueeze the image--few Laserdisc players

00:09:24.240 --> 00:09:28.140
had the ability to self-letterbox like any
DVD player can.

00:09:28.140 --> 00:09:33.020
So unless you had a 16:9 television, which
was a rare thing even in Japan while Laserdisc

00:09:33.020 --> 00:09:37.160
was still current, a Squeeze LD would actually
really suck.

00:09:37.160 --> 00:09:41.500
As you can imagine they aren’t particularly
common, and they were never released in the States.

00:09:41.500 --> 00:09:43.080
Well, that about covers it.

00:09:43.089 --> 00:09:45.230
I think we said all there is to say about
Laserdisc.

00:09:45.230 --> 00:09:46.230
Except no!

00:09:46.230 --> 00:09:47.230
There’s one more thing!

00:09:47.230 --> 00:09:48.300
A bonus fact!

00:09:48.300 --> 00:09:50.600
There WERE recordable Laserdiscs!

00:09:50.610 --> 00:09:52.740
And in at least three varieties.

00:09:52.740 --> 00:09:58.301
Just like the CD-R is a thing, so was the
LD-R. Except they were really called RLV for

00:09:58.301 --> 00:10:00.060
Recordable Laser Videodisc.

00:10:00.060 --> 00:10:04.930
Now, Wikipedia tells us with no accompanying
citation that these were developed and marketed

00:10:04.930 --> 00:10:07.480
by the Optical Disc Corporation in 1984.

00:10:07.480 --> 00:10:11.860
I’ve linked some forum threads down below
which shed some light on the issue, and it

00:10:11.860 --> 00:10:16.790
could be that fewer than 10 machines ever
existed which could write to these RLVs.

00:10:16.790 --> 00:10:21.820
But, once written, they were compatible with
standard Laserdisc players, just as a CD-R is

00:10:21.820 --> 00:10:23.300
with any old CD player.

00:10:23.300 --> 00:10:24.300
Usually.

00:10:24.300 --> 00:10:26.760
The second variety was actually re-writable.

00:10:26.779 --> 00:10:32.050
The Pioneer VDR-V1000 was a behemoth of a
machine, equipped with 2 lasers to enable

00:10:32.050 --> 00:10:36.480
reading in one place while writing in another,
and the caddy-protected discs had a theoretical

00:10:36.480 --> 00:10:39.140
lifespan of one million re-writes.

00:10:39.140 --> 00:10:45.220
But, this thing was definitely for professional
use only, with a retail price of £25,000.

00:10:45.220 --> 00:10:48.500
Discs, though, were quite the bargain at only
£800.

00:10:48.500 --> 00:10:53.990
Sony developed a third, almost unrelated writable
video standard called CRV, which rather than

00:10:53.990 --> 00:10:55.790
being a midsize crossover...

00:10:55.790 --> 00:11:01.050
I mean a re-writable disc, was a write-once
read-many format, but it only held 24 minutes

00:11:01.050 --> 00:11:02.050
per side.

00:11:02.050 --> 00:11:05.730
It was mainly used as a video backup system
in the professional market.

00:11:05.730 --> 00:11:11.550
Interesting, CRV stands for Component Recordable
Video disc, which makes me wonder if it stored

00:11:11.550 --> 00:11:14.280
component signals rather than composite.

00:11:14.280 --> 00:11:16.639
Perhaps that would explain its reduced runtime.

00:11:16.639 --> 00:11:20.399
There might have been more recordable versions
of Laserdisc out there, but information on

00:11:20.399 --> 00:11:21.399
them is scarce.

00:11:21.399 --> 00:11:25.740
A lot of info for this video came from forum
threads on the Laserdisc archive, the Laserdisc

00:11:25.740 --> 00:11:27.959
Database, and even CED magic.

00:11:27.959 --> 00:11:31.149
I’ve put some links down below if you’d
like to take a look at these conversations.

00:11:31.149 --> 00:11:34.560
I believe I owe particular thanks to Disclord
for his knowledge.

00:11:34.560 --> 00:11:36.860
Well now, that is all I have to say about
Laserdisc.

00:11:36.860 --> 00:11:40.300
I’m sure we’ll look at it again in some
fashion, especially as I want to get this

00:11:40.300 --> 00:11:44.111
machine working again, but I think I’ve
compiled everything you might want to know

00:11:44.111 --> 00:11:47.660
about the format into video form, if I do
say so myself.

00:11:47.660 --> 00:11:50.310
Well, I’m sure that’s not true, but hopefully
most of it.

00:11:50.310 --> 00:11:52.380
As always, thank you so much for watching.

00:11:52.380 --> 00:11:54.720
And thank you to everyone who supports this
channel on Patreon,

00:11:54.720 --> 00:11:57.360
especially these fine individuals.

00:11:57.360 --> 00:12:01.120
I know I’ve said this before, but support
from Patreon literally is what keeps these

00:12:01.120 --> 00:12:02.480
videos coming.

00:12:02.480 --> 00:12:07.060
Very soon this channel will become my full-time
job thanks to the amazing support you’ve pledged.

00:12:07.060 --> 00:12:08.060
Thank you.

00:12:08.100 --> 00:12:11.580
If you are interested in supporting the channel
too, please check out my Patreon page.

00:12:12.000 --> 00:12:14.540
Thank you for your consideration, and I’ll
see you next time!

